This Thursday will spark another round of protests attacking fast food chains like McDonald’s, Burger King, KFC, and Walmart for not paying a higher living or minimum wage to employees. Under current federal law, employees making minimum wage earn $7.25 per hour, which for a full time employee averages $15,080 a year minus overtime. The argument for a higher living wage is not one based on math, worth as an employee or a higher total output for the employer, but on fairness and entitlement. Union leaders and political activists, who provided the majority of the paid protesters on Black Friday against Walmart, seem to think very little of the “poor” helpless people who have jobs this holiday season.
Here are 5 things that union leaders, paid and unpaid protesters, as well as hard working Americans can keep in mind when fighting against the injustice of agreed paid wages:
1. When arguing for a higher living or minimum wage it is respectful to at least keep in mind that people are free to quit the harsh enslavement of Walmart and the evil fast food chains at any time.
2. Union leaders and liberal activists must stop giving the impression that entry-level workers are too stupid to ever make more money on their own or even get a raise or promotion.
3. By arguing for a 50 percent increase to the minimum wage, liberals protesters and union leaders are stealing from my 57.3 percent (adjusted for inflation) increase over ten years of my earned living wage, which started at $4.10 an hour. I thought liberals were about generational justice?
4. All workers who are protesting this Thursday for the injustice of their low wage –using paid time off for the protest — must be ready to be fired for a higher working wage — and therefore living wage — of all workers who actually show up and do their jobs.
5. All fast food restaurants and superstores like Walmart and Target must agree to send all unhappy workers to Africa or Mexico with their union and liberal representation so that the word poverty can be properly applied to all future conversations.
Only in America will you find the haves pretending to be the have-nots, protesting against employment they freely keep, for a God-given right that does not exist, to earn more money for a job they believe to be beneath them. If only widespread abortion could solve this problem of stupidity, I might consider being pro-life with certain exceptions for not only the mother, but the existence of a sane society.:)
A new cornerstone piece on public education by Allison Benedikton on Slate.com titled, “If You Send Your Kid to Private School, You Are a Bad Person,” was shocking but consistent and clearly revealed that liberals value the word “education,” as long as the word “public,” precedes it. According to the author, public schools continue to fail because parents are sending their children to private schools, instead of public schools. Parents who spend their hard earned money to send their children to private schools are in fact destroying the fabric of America’s public education: which is immoral. For liberals, abortion is not a moral issue but rather an issue of liberty and choice. Education whether public, private or charter, should have the same application of liberty and personal choice. Unfortunately, allowing freedom and choice in education would require an admission of failure and for liberals to turn their back on a core government institution.
This is because liberals value community more than the first and primary institution, which is “The Family.” Liberals believe that public education equals strong community and that all people have an obligation to community before family. Since community is more important than family, we are therefore obligated to send our children to public schools that are failing. Liberals would also suggest that we invest our time and other resources to improve the failing schools, as if other options did not exist. Truthfully, I feel no such obligation to public education nor can I intellectually rationalize sentencing my child to state education for the sake of the greater good. Public schools need good students and good parents and I understand that, but not at the cost of my child’s future.
So in applying this blind allegiance, if I live near a failing public school –which many people do – I have an obligation to send my children to that school. I also by implication of this argument have an obligation to fight for what my child needs as in new computers, AP classes, and specialized education. Liberals believe that property taxes are not enough, even for parents who pay for public education and do not use it and also pay for private education. Liberals want more than our money they want our flesh and blood and for us to sacrifice our children on the public school altar no matter the cost. Instead, I would rather send my child to a school where I believe they will be educated, instead of learning how to be busy worker bees producing widgets. It is my belief that classes in formal logic, centered in a classical education, will provide my child with an ancient forgotten skill: the ability to think and reason properly.
In my opinion, public education is as bad as public restrooms or public swimming pools. People become accustomed to free stuff and then develop a sense of entitlement believing they deserve community pools and free lunches. Feeling that we have certain natural rights and actually having them are two completely different things. I feel I have a natural right to dunk a basketball and play in the NBA, but no matter how hard I practice, playing in the NBA is not possible because I am a 170-pound short white guy. The government does not give rights to people and our constitution only protects our natural rights from the threat of government. Liberals and progressives in the Democratic Party have an agenda that is connected to a misguided worldview and it starts in public education.
Liberals value equality and so do conservatives, but the definition of that word is used very differently between conservatives and liberals. I believe human beings have natural rights by the very nature of being human, whereas liberals believe their rights come from government. Conservatives believe in equality of opportunity, as all men and women being equal before God. Liberals on the other hand believe in equality of outcomes, where everyone becomes so equal that no one really has anything at all.
Applying the equality of outcomes to education is not only foolish but also dangerous. I will send my child to a school where their talent will be cultivated and they will learn how to think. In short, any school that is in line with my values is where I want my child to attend.
Leave the public schools to liberals and to people who do not care and wish to die on the hill of public education reform. The longer we suffer the fools of government the longer they can pretend their grand ideas are working. I do believe in community and in the importance of education. What we are missing is not the want or desire for community and better education, but an actual foundation for community to exist.